Sunday, February 10, 2008

A Dog Defeated

A week ago Gourmet made me guffaw: the magazine proclaimed that a certain Devil Dog Cake, while as easy to make as a pan of brownies, could gratify every desire that brownies could not. This I found hard to believe. I baked the Devil Dog Cake, following the recipe to the letter, so that I might judge for myself the cake's caliber.

As promised, the Devil Dog Cake was a cinch to prepare. I had only one hang-up: the direction to add water to the cake batter flew in the face of my bakerly instincts. The liquids I usually add to batters threaten to halt one's heart upon overconsumption: melted butter, oils, milks, and creams. But I remained faithful to Gourmet's recipe and hosed down the batter. Truth be told, I hoped this whole ordeal would end in failure. To this end, the airy, mousse-like batter was not a good sign.

The Devil Dog Cake puffed up proudly in the oven, its ego no doubt swollen by Gourmet's fawning. I let it rest for a few hours and then attempted the marshmallow frosting; the pathetic outcome of that endeavor is made obvious in these photos. Fortunately the frosting mattered little in the case of Devil Dog Cake v. Brownie.

My first bite: the cake dissolved into a thousand feathery crumbs the instant it touched my tongue. Then, curiously, the little crumbs clumped back together and formed a buttery wad of cake that was so dense as to be nearly suffocating. There was a chocolate flavor, sure, but I did not taste chocolate. A tinny, bittersweet sapor was all that suggested cocoa content. This struck me as familiar, and now I realize why.

No chocolate cake is chocolatey enough to cure a craving.

Reflect upon your last - or even your best - experience with chocolate cake. Stripped of its icing and other accouterments, could it have satisfied an intense desire for chocolate? Or was the texture a tad too lightweight, its flavor a bit on the bland side? To me, a chocolate cake is only as good as the buttercreams slathered on it. Yet a brownie is a ganache-turned-gâteau, a forkable frosting, a candy bar made cakey. Brownies require just enough eggs, flour, butter, sugar, and talent to properly showcase good chocolate; cakes require just enough chocolate to showcase good eggs, flour, butter, sugar and talent.

This court rules in favor of the defendant.

7 comments:

JoytheBaker said...

A 'forkable frosting'- touhe. I must admit, the cake looks pretty mouthwatering, mostly because of the gooey white marshmallow frosting. Please, for the love of all that is holy, put that frosting on a brownie. Forkable frosting plus ooey gooey white frosting. I might die.

Bakerella said...

Your writing makes me smile. Keep it up.

Anonymous said...

A great brownie needs no frosting

Jessica said...

Anonymous - I agree completely. That's why the naked, humble brownie triumphs over the vainglorious cake.

Nuts are also an unnecessary addition to the perfect brownie.

Kate the Foodie said...

Ina Garten's chocolate cake. IT CHANGED MY LIFE, and I'm not kidding. The chocolate flavor is brought out with coffee, and it's ridiculously rich without being cloying or heavy. I'll be putting it on my blog at some point; I've made it twice now, and every time it's praised as "better than the best pastry/cake shop." Plus, the frosting has two sticks of butter in it and is still light.

It's truly a miracle.

Also, the texture of that gourmet cake sounds terrible! Yech. Sorry you wasted ingredients!

Contented Me (Kristin) said...

I just found your site and am absolutely entertained by your writing. Where do you come up with this stuff? Priceless. ;)

Mary said...

No cake will ever be more chocolatey than a brownie, I completely agree with you and shall campaign for "respect the brownie" actively....haha your writing made me laugh,very funny.I shall visit again.